How to read this report
The gap matters more than the score. Where your rating and your raters' rating differ most is where there is something to learn. A high number on its own tells you very little.
Rated higher than you rated yourself? Common, and usually means you underrate something that comes easily to you. It is worth knowing what other people already think you are good at.
Rated lower? Also useful, and not a judgement on you. It usually points at something you do not get many chances to show.
Nothing here is a mark. It is not used for grading, and no employer sees it unless you show them.
Download it, or share it. The PDF button gives you a clean copy to attach to an application. A share link shows this page to one person, expires on a date you pick, and can be switched off whenever you want.
Riverside State University · Guided tour
Alex Moreau
Submitted October 6, 2026, measured against NACE Career Readiness v1.
Your development note
AI generatedYou rated yourself lowest in career and self-development and in equity and inclusion, and highest in communication, teamwork and technology. Your supervisor rated you above your own rating on almost every competency, and furthest above it on the two you scored lowest.
That pattern is common and it is worth taking seriously. It usually means you are judging yourself against what you think the standard should be, while somebody who watched you work is judging you against what people at your stage actually do.
The useful next step is not to work harder at those two. It is to ask Morgan what they saw you do that you did not count.
Written by an AI model from the scores above and nothing else. Your name was not sent to it. It is a prompt for reflection, not an evaluation, and it did not influence any score on this page.
By competency
Your own rating and your raters' rating side by side. The difference is the part worth talking about, in either direction.
Your 3 raters did not agree here: their individual scores ranged from 3.3 to 5.0. People who saw you in different settings may have seen different things.
Your 3 raters did not agree here: their individual scores ranged from 4.0 to 5.0. People who saw you in different settings may have seen different things.
Your 3 raters did not agree here: their individual scores ranged from 2.7 to 4.7. People who saw you in different settings may have seen different things.
Your 3 raters did not agree here: their individual scores ranged from 3.0 to 4.7. People who saw you in different settings may have seen different things.
Your 3 raters did not agree here: their individual scores ranged from 3.0 to 4.7. People who saw you in different settings may have seen different things.
Your 3 raters did not agree here: their individual scores ranged from 3.0 to 4.8. People who saw you in different settings may have seen different things.
Your 3 raters did not agree here: their individual scores ranged from 4.3 to 5.0. People who saw you in different settings may have seen different things.
Your 3 raters did not agree here: their individual scores ranged from 3.7 to 5.0. People who saw you in different settings may have seen different things.
Where you and your raters see things differently
Your raters rated you 1.2 higher than you rated yourself on Career and Self-Development. People often underrate the things they find easy.
How to read this
Scores are the average of how often you said each behaviour describes you, on a 1 to 5 scale. Every competency counts equally toward the overall figure, regardless of how many questions it contains. Questions you marked not applicable, or left blank, are excluded rather than counted as low.
This is a development tool, not an evaluation. It is not validated for decisions about admission, employment, discipline, financial aid or academic standing.
Share this report
Employers and graduate programmes often ask for evidence of the skills behind a CV. A share link shows this page, without giving anyone an account or access to anything else. It stops working on the date you choose, and you can switch it off at any time.
Download as PDF Manage feedback requests
The NACE Career Readiness Competency framework is the property of the National Association of Colleges and Employers. This is an independent implementation and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NACE.